by Richard Pedersen
Anyone who has read this blog for any length of time knows how I feel about Tasers and other various so-called non-lethal weapons. They suck. Period.
They give the users (read: Police) the false sense that they won’t actually be harming anyone. It’s just a matter of control. And therein lies the crux of the whole matter, doesn’t it. If you don’t think you are going to hurt somebody, then you are far more likely to use that method. No?
It doesn’t matter that you may very well kill them in spite of your best intentions.
The following video discusses this very thing.
Pepper spray and tasers are in increasing use by both police and military, and more exotic non-lethal weapons such as heat rays are in the works. At TEDxCanberra, ethicist Stephen Coleman explores the unexpected consequences of their introduction and asks some challenging questions.
Here’s the clip:
I hope you will think about the use of these nasty devices and think also, for a moment, what it would be like to be on the receiving end of these things.
It doesn’t matter whether you deserve it or not. It’s all dependent on the whim of the officer at hand and whether he believes it will hurt you in some permanent fashion. And, whatever you do, don’t take up a “more threatening pose in bed”. You’ll be sorry.
And, oh, how easy it is to shoot when you don’t believe it’s going to hurt all that much.